In the autumn of 1973, barely a fortnight after the new batch arrived at Government Medical College, Nagpur, the seniors came for the first-year students. Ragging was the word for it \u2014 a rite that combined humiliation, hazing, and the assertion of hierarchy in roughly equal measure. It was not gentle. Vinod Sawaitul was ragged. He was hurt. And then, distinctively, he decided not to absorb the hurt quietly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He protested. He filed a case. His action led to a strike on the GMC campus. The ragging was abolished \u2014 for a time. The dress code that marked first-year students as subordinates \u2014 white shirt, trousers, black shoes \u2014 was removed. None of this was a small thing in an institution where seniority had long conferred impunity. Vinod Sawaitul was, in the autumn of 1973, eighteen years old. He would carry the character that drove that protest through four decades of academic medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n
Vinod was born in Nagpur into a family whose business was a saw mill \u2014 the processing of timber that fuelled the construction economy of Vidarbha. His father Krishnarao earned enough to support a family of six children: four brothers and two sisters. The children received what Vinod describes as high-quality education despite modest means \u2014 a distinction that was less paradoxical in a city like Nagpur, where good government schools and competitive colleges offered real mobility to families who prioritised learning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He went to Corporation School, Bastarwari Mulanchi Shala for primary education, then to New English High School in Mahal, and then to Dharampeth Science College for his pre-medical education. It was at Dharampeth that he prepared for the entrance examinations that would take him to GMC. He was admitted in 1973 as Roll Number 173, Batch D.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After graduation, he interned at Wadner Primary Health Center in Wardha district alongside Ashok Gambhir and Yogendra Bansod, and completed his urban internship at GMC Nagpur. He then moved to Swami Ramanand Teerth Rural Government Medical College, Ambajogai, where he was appointed as a Lecturer in Anatomy in 1980. A year later he transferred to Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, where he was appointed as a Lecturer in Pathology in 1982. The shift from Anatomy to Pathology \u2014 both preclinical disciplines, both requiring microscope work and a certain tolerance for ambiguity \u2014 was not a change of direction so much as a refinement of it.<\/p>\n\n\n
Vinod did his MD (Pathology) from IGGMC Nagpur. His thesis, supervised by Dr. Pendsey, examined Cervical Condylomatous Atypia and its relationship with cervical intraepithelial lesions \u2014 a topic that required close engagement with the emerging literature on HPV and cervical pathology that was reshaping gynaecological oncology in the 1980s. The subject was timely, the methodology rigorous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
His subsequent academic career took him through six Government Medical Colleges across Maharashtra: GMC Nagpur, GMC Solapur, GMC Yavatmal, IGGMC Nagpur, GMC Akola, and finally GMC Chandrapur, where he served as Professor and Head of the Department of Pathology from 2015 to 2022, also holding the position of vice-dean. Six postings across three decades: the pattern of a committed government academic who went where the service needed him, built departments in each place, and moved on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In June 2016, while at GMC Chandrapur, Vinod fractured his right hip. The injury led to deep vein thrombosis, which propagated to his pulmonary arteries as a pulmonary embolism. He recognised the signs himself \u2014 the breathlessness, the pleuritic chest pain, the clinical picture \u2014 and alerted his treating doctors quickly. The diagnosis was made accurately and treatment began without delay. He recovered fully, returned to work, and was driving his own car within months. “I used my knowledge to alert the doctors quickly,” he said afterwards. It is the kind of clinical self-awareness that a lifetime of Pathology \u2014 the discipline of looking carefully at what is there, not what ought to be there \u2014 tends to produce.<\/p>\n\n\n
The story of Vinod Sawaitul and the 1973 ragging episode has a particular resonance in the context of the decades that followed. The abolition of ragging from Indian medical colleges was a long, contested, and ultimately incomplete process. The Medical Council of India issued guidelines; the Supreme Court of India took up the matter. Institutions that had treated ragging as tradition resisted change. The culture shifted slowly, unevenly, with setbacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vinod’s act in 1973 \u2014 filing a case, triggering a strike, forcing a temporary abolition \u2014 was not decisive in that larger story. But it was early, and it was principled, and it was done by a student who had no institutional protection and nothing to gain from the confrontation except his self-respect. The detail is worth holding: in a profession that sometimes mistakes compliance for virtue, the eighteen-year-old from the saw mill family in Nagpur chose to push back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He moved to Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Medical Sciences in Durg, Chhattisgarh, at the invitation of his friend Prakash Wakode, sharing the campus with Sudhakar Dupare, Ashok Ganjre, and Prakash Bhatkule \u2014 a small reunion of GMC 1973 batchmates in the latter phase of their careers. His wife Sudha Apte, a gynaecologist from MGIMS Sevagram’s 1976 batch, died in 1999. Their son Nikhil holds an MBA from the Faculty of Management Studies, Delhi, and works in digital payments with IDFC Bank; he is married and has two children. Their daughter Pallavi has an MBA in Finance and works with Bank of Baroda in senior management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Vinod Sawaitul is, by his own description and the description of those who know him, a person for whom honesty in practice \u2014 “no kickbacks, no cuts, no commissions, no doctored reporting” \u2014 was not a strategy but a way of being. He refused tests when they were not needed. He explained results in language patients could understand. He built departments in places where they had not existed. The protest he filed in 1973 and the career he built thereafter are, in retrospect, the same gesture: the refusal to accept that things must be worse than they need to be.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"